Posted in Branding, eTailing, Future, Management

A really QR butt, and it is ok to look

QR codes (Quick Response codes) are growing rapidly in terms of adoption for marketing purposes.

QR codes use proprietary technology (a Toyota subsidiary) but they have elected not exercise copyright. Microsoft has created an equivalent product.

Just like barcodes contain information about a product, the QR code can contain information. But because the Barcodes are one dimensional and QR codes are two dimensional, the type and amount of information is vastly increased.

There are various types of equipment that can scan a QR code, but its growth is fuelled by a range of apps that can be downloaded to your smart phone.

Typically it can be printed on anything:

Marketing collateral, posters, dockets, products and even on bums.

(In the image above, the ladies are sponsored by Betfair, and by snapping the QR code on their bums, you will be directed to the sponsor’s website. Sourced from dailytelgraph.co.uk)

 

QR Codes could link to:

  • Installation instructions
  • Competition entry forms
  • Directions to your business
  • Recommendations for complementary products and services
  • Free mp3 or video downloads
  • Customer feedback forms

 

Why don’t you try it?

You need to download a QR app to your smart phone.

I use Red Laser (on Android) which is actually a scanner that also compares prices on the fly. (For a video that shows how Red Laser works – and it is a bit scary for retailers – have a look at this video.)

 

You will note that it actually takes you to a mobile-optimised version of the website.

There is a new service that optimises your site for free (and there is a premium version available too).

To create your own QR code, you can use goo.gl (the url shortener) or simply search for QR code generators.

Ok, that should keep you busy for the next 30 minutes…

Enjoy

(And let me know what you think in the comments below.)

 

Dennis

PS: I am thinking I might do a special feature on QR codes in the next issue of my newsletter. If you think it will be useful let me know (and cast your vote by subscribing in the meantime.)

Advertisements
Posted in eTailing, Future, Shopper Marketing, Strategy

The Red Laser App

Retail is getting tougher and tougher.

Shopping is getting easier and easier.

I have become aware of Red Laser some time ago and have tried it out.

It is a little bit scary.

 

 

 

 

I like Red Laser for its ability to also scan QR codes. (Post about that to follow.)

Posted in eTailing, Future

Is this the future?

I don’t really think that this type of feature will become part of mainstream retail. 

I think it will be part of concept stores and it will/may become part of an extended online experience.

It is pretty snazzy.

It is RELEVANT because we need to know what physical stores need to do to compete and to raise the bar of 3D Retail.

But it does not matter what I think – what do you think?

adiVerse Cannes promotion from Start JudgeGill on Vimeo.

 

AND PS: If you do not know what 3D retail is all about, subscribe on the site to our newsletter and I will let you in to the secret…

Posted in eTailing, Future

Five critical decisions all retailers face

Retailers have chosen to pitch their tents on the beach of life where the changes of society wash onto the shore.

It is beautiful, it is exciting and it is dynamic – but these waves are relentless too. As the saying goes, the only constant is change…

There are some pressing changes that all retailers will have to consider – and the five decisions below seem to me to be the most pressing:

  1. Am I going to accept mobile phone payment methods? (Key word: NFC = Near Field Communications.)
  2. How am I going to generate an alternative revenue stream by somehow figuring out how to charge for the service/experience of a physical store visit?
  3. How do I make my shopping experience authentically social? (And how will I manage that with limited/existing resources, constraints and skills?)
  4. Which online channel(s) will I choose to supplement the bricks-and-mortar? (Not IF you are going to do it, but which one…)
  5. What will my pricing strategy be across multiple channels? (Consistent or differentiated – and how will my customers react to that.)

To survive, grow and prosper requires all players to deepen their knowledge about all things retail. To that end we produce an irregular newsletter that contains detailed information, multimedia, links, templates and other resources. (See this example.)

I would like to help, so what do you want to know more about? Give me one click HERE – and you will have it.

After you have done that, watch this 3-min video: The future of shopping.

 

PS: Back in 2000 we were discussing the likelihood of landlords charging consumers admission fees (to the centre) in lieu of charging rent to the retailers.

From memory, we thought $1 admission fee would raise the same dollars as the rent roll.

I wonder of that will happen one day? Just think how innovative you will be able to get with the retail mix – and how that would drive traffic? It may not be far-fetched after all…

 

 

Posted in eTailing, Future

The cloud

Apple is doing more than any other company to shape the interaction we have with our personal electronic devices.

 

http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=00cbecddc1d01&p=fc_social

 

I use the following CLOUD applications already.

  1. Teuxdeux
  2. BillingBoss
  3. Dropbox
  4. ELearning system (LMS)
  5. Yammer
  6. Join.me
  7. Soho.OS
  8. Mystery Shopping Software
  9. Smartsheets
  10. Google Docs
  11. Newsletter.com

For Retailers, there are already application that run in the cloud – and more to come. The big one will be POS – as soon as we start believing the cloud is stabel enough. And Steve Jobs will make sure we do…

 

Posted in eTailing, Future, Strategy

Your place or mine?

The internet is presenting many vexing challenges in many industries and retailers and retail landlords are not exempt. One such question is whether one should sign up to (or build) an online shopping centre (a ‘portal’).

I hope my observations are just as valuable to property managers thinking about going into this space as it is for retailers who are thinking of signing up. (My arguments actually hold true for any non-internet company entering this space although I refer to shopping centre landlords given the audience of this website.)

THE OPTIONS

There are a few shopping ‘portals’ that have launched – and soon more will come knocking on your Inbox.

There is OfferMe, or Westfield’s initiative and not to forget that ubiquitous Google has done the same with several Australian retailers in tow. The list goes on, and I would not be surprised if most major landlords are planning a similar initiative.

There are many additional options for retailers to enter the online space directly or indirectly:

  1. Go it alone (Using SEO and creating a dedicated ‘etail’ destination)
  2. The ‘daily deals’ sites (e.g. Catch of the Day, Spreets)
  3. Sell through 3rd Party sites (e.g. EBay)
  4. Using plug-ins (APIs) to leverage Facebook (for example) as a trading platform (Payvment is one free option.)
  5. Leveraging social media (Foursquare, Twitter) for promotional purposes or using online coupons (Groupon, Living Social) is not ‘real’ online retailing, but tangentially relevant to this argument.

THE ANSWER

The answer to the question I posed to landlords and retailers above is…‘probably not’.

I will qualify my answer with two salient observations:

 

In 2002 I was tasked with the responsibility of shutting down the eCommerce initiatives of my then employer – a major Australian Retail Property Manager. I am intimately familiar with many aspects of operations like these. I am not familiar with the cultures and strategies of ANY of the current players in this space – and I am not commenting about anyone’s specific strategy.

I am also (as a minority shareholder) in the process of raising capital for a venture in this space that will completely change the way retail businesses runs – using current technology. (If we get it up.) I mention this because I have researched this space well, and for a long time. (And in case there are investors out there…)

I mention these two facts because my observation may be somewhat contentious – but only if it is misconstrued. I don’t have an agenda and I don’t have any particular insight into any current initiative, and I am not commenting about anyone’s strategy.

But if you decide to do it anyway, I would like to point out the traps and fallacious arguments or ‘benefits’ that are trotted out in the typical business case.

1. The economics of the web is completely different.

If a brand-new site (ala Zappos) can go from 0 to millions in months and be capitalised in the BILLIONS in a few years, then being small, being new and being unknown is of no consequence.

Having a ‘brand’ in the ‘real world’ is of no relevance on the web.

Consequently, the questions to be answered are:

(a) What is the real value that the portal ‘administrator’ will add?

(b) And is this reflected the deal you are signing up for?

Before you do a deal on the internet, you have to appreciate a completely different set of economics. For instance, how much would pay someone as an ‘affiliate marketer’ to promote your product online? I sell a few eBooks, and the typical commission is 50%. Some products offer 100% commission (because the seller makes money afterwards once the ‘buyer’ is on his site.) On the other hand, eBay charges anything from $0.01 to $19.99.

Suffice to say the value proposition in the online world is fluid, and there is often limited precedent.

2. Does the portal operator ‘get’ internet culture?

There is such a thing as internet culture and it is the opposite of pretty much every ‘culture’ I have ever observed on the corporate world.

I don’t say this lightly – I have worked on 4 continents and it is pretty much universal:

Every big business wants to have control. On the web you have to dispossess yourself of that notion – and for obvious reasons established companies find that almost impossible.

For example, having ‘policies’ on your portal that cover the following areas would be a sure sign of NOT ‘getting’ the internet:

  • Comments will be moderated and negative ones will be deemed inflammatory and be banned.
  • The ‘tenants’ on the portal will have to comply with ‘communication guidelines’.
  • The site values its brand and consequently sets limits as to what you can sell and how you can promote it, and some sort of control to ensure ‘just enough variety’ but not too much competition.
  • The portal owner owns the traffic – and may share some of the data with you but not all.
  • You will have to maintain certain ‘standards’…
  • The strategy is to aggregate different types of retailers – just like in a shopping centre – because it is ‘convenient’ for the customer. (How inconvenient is it really to jump to another shop on the other side of the world with one click?)

This command-and-control approach does not work online.

People don’t want to have relationships with brands. They want to have relationships with people.

The question is: can your company act like it is ‘people’? This applies to the ‘portal’ and the ‘shopfront’ – and it is the test of whether you really ‘get’ it.

The reality is that companies act like companies.

If you think you can control anything, there are about a gazillion hackers and a squadron of trolls lined up to prove you wrong.

I would be very surprised if any established non-internet company can truly change their culture and their strategy to one that operates effectively on the web.

Not even a company like Microsoft can play the internet game successfully. The transition from corporate behemoth to an internet-ready ‘player’ is a cultural issue and has nothing to do with technology, products, experience, strategy, brand or capital.

This is one of the main reasons why media companies have failed to translate their dominance of the content/news and existing relationships with readers into web-dominance. This is why we use Wikipedia and not Encyclopaedia Britannica.

3. Is there a formal agreement with a specific term reminiscent of a lease?

Every successful eCommerce site that I can think of operates on the basis of pay-as-you-go, and leave-whenever-you-like.

The internet is anarchic. The site owner has no power and no real influence – beyond what is granted by the internet ‘community’. You will never win an argument with the crowd (even if you are ‘right’) – and no matter what your terms and conditions stipulate, the user is really, really always right.

To think that a relationship can be governed by a contract has always been a stupid idea (designed to make money for lawyers), and on the web this is affirmed daily with few exceptions.

In an age of rapid technological development (long) contracts may be economic suicide.

For instance, even though eBay has T&C – they fundamentally rely on the users to rate each other and the community effectively sets the standards.

IN SUMMARY

I have highlighted just three indicators that may signal that there may be danger ahead.

  • Does the relationship reflect fair value in the context of the internet environment, or is premised on the same principles as a shopping centre – or any ‘traditional’ worldview?
  • Does the portal ‘get’ and accept the anarchic nature of the internet?
  • Are there digital locks and chains to tie you down?

MY ADVICE TO RETAILERS AND PROSPECTIVE PORTAL OWNERS:

Don’t rush.

Unlike real estate, there is not a limited supply of space. According to the US Department of Commerce, 4% of commercial activity occurs online. 96% occurs off line. The one with the right PROPOSITION will win – not the one who was first. (Remember, there was Six Degrees before Myspace and Facebook. There was Altavista before Yahoo and Google.)

There is a difference between the leading edge and the bleeding edge – and it is a fine line.

It’s about people.

The real change in shopping is the ‘social dimension’. This is of course not new – every decent property manager and retailer knows this and uses this.

People are social and will always be. Think about how this aspect will manifest itself in the ‘new order’ – and don’t focus on the technology.

Experiment.

Whilst you don’t have to rush, you do have to evolve. There is a strong meme on the internet at the moment (see this HBR archive) about the importance (and benefits) of failure. In this new world order you have to simply ‘launch’ and get on with it. Being stuck in a cycle of constant executive reviews works well when you are building a billion dollar shopping centre. Not so much when you are building a $500 website that you will scrap tomorrow.

If you are you are going to do it, you have setup that business truly independently and staff it with people who are not representative of the organisation. (Transferring your ‘stars’ across will be the worst thing you can do because they will naturally emulate the strategies and behaviours that previously made them successful.)

Consider Seth Godin’s wise words:

“As you gain resources, the act of being wrong goes from being fatal to annoying to a precious opportunity, something that you’ve earned. You won’t advance your cause or discover new truths if you’re obsessed with being right all the time…”

Established businesses rarely understand how being wrong can be an opportunity. And the internet practically ensures (if not demands) that you are ‘wrong’. Constant change must be in your corporate DNA.

Social media is not magic. Read this, from a respected Ad Agency CEO, for a full explanation. Forrester research notes (in effect) that social media is just an enabler – and not black magic.

I outline a basic strategy with some tools for you here. Learn how to use it. Use it. Just don’t expect it to ‘save’ a business that is otherwise flawed.

First and foremost the internet is about people, and unless you get what they are all about – and unless you are prepared to abandon your old paradigms, I am convinced the best conceived venture will fail. Conversely, if you really ‘get’ the internet, chances are you could be successful.

CONCLUSION

This post has been about a specific type of online trading opportunity and my arguments don’t necessarily apply to all the other multi-channel opportunities.

In addition to the decision to go multi-channel or not, it is imperative for retailers to get their businesses adapted to mobile technology and also to understand the new social landscape. These are three hairy challenges indeed.

Would you like to know if you have what it takes?

As promised earlier here is the ‘do-you-get-it’ quiz:

  1.  Do you know who Gary Vaynerchuk is and do you share his view about internet?
  2. If you don’t know who he is, I’ll give you a second chance. If you understand and agree with what he is saying here then you have also passed the quiz.

I hope that I helped you get there.