The problem is the way we ‘see things’.
The solution is the way we ‘see things’.
Except we don’t understand how we see things.
The problem is the way we ‘see things’.
The solution is the way we ‘see things’.
Except we don’t understand how we see things.
Retail is getting tougher and tougher.
Shopping is getting easier and easier.
I have become aware of Red Laser some time ago and have tried it out.
It is a little bit scary.
I like Red Laser for its ability to also scan QR codes. (Post about that to follow.)
Why do dissatisfied customers stay and satisfied customers go?
This is a partial cross-post from my Inside Retailing column. But I add a few additional insights that would not be appropriate in that forum: here I can say whatever I like…
Have you ever vowed not to shop a certain store – only to return some time later, hoping no one notices or asks?
Have you ever wondered why satisfied customers really hang around? Or, conversely have you wondered why dissatisfied customers don’t always leave?
Seiders et al conducted research (Journal of Marketing paper, Vol 69, 2005) into customer satisfaction, including a longitudinal study (over a long period of time) and established a few major drivers of customer visitation behaviour.
They distinguished between actual behaviours as well as reported intent. (And yes, customers don’t always do what they say they will do.)
They determined that there were four factors that influenced actual behaviour:
If you study this list of factors carefully, you will note that there is only one of these factors that are fully in your control on a day to day basis.
Can you spot which one it is?
It is customer involvement, of course; because all the other elements are ‘external factors’ and therefore by definition not controllable. (Initial choice of location is one element of convenience, but it is relatively difficult to change anyway.)
This would mean different things in different businesses.
So it stands to reason that we have two simple choices to make:
What will it be for you?
Of course, customers want different degrees of involvement. It is worth noting that none of the following qualify as customer involvement:
Most retailers (and even consultants) think that the answer is better customer service.
It is NOT.
Customer service is a cost of entry. Many retailers who are currently being punished in the perfect storm of global financial hardships, growth in eCommerce and changing consumer habits deserve to be punished.
It is sad. It gives me no pleasure to say it. But really, how long can you expect the customers to hang in there when your service sucks?
Good service won’t win them back.
The game has changed. Forever.
Yuu now have to figure out how you change your business model to deliver a customer experience that will win over customers again.
If you are interested in understanding the difference between customer service and customer experience, you can go to town HERE. (Normally it’s reserved for subscribers only, but this is too important to keep behind the wall.)
This is an extract from our previous newsletter on 3D Retailing.
(Apologies to those who subscribe. If you don’t, drop your email in the box, and I will give you access.)
The OLD way (two-dimensional)
The NEW way (three dimensional)
Whilst you may argue that you would not like the ‘new’ restaurant experience, that is not quite the point. This is just one example aimed at people who do this for the food experience. I am sure you can imagine a few other ‘themes’ or experiential outcomes that would suit your tastes better – and if there us a market for it, some restauranteer will cater for it.
The point of this exercise is to imagine how a ‘traditional’ concept might be transformed in an experience. You may think a restaurant is an easy option, but the same can be done for a travel agent, a hair dresser or a shoe shop – quite easily.
Dreaming up the experience is the easy part.
Translating it into a physical experience (staff, systems, procedures etc.) is the hard part.
And of course doing so at a profit is harder still.
We used to say that forests have been decimated on a topic that has received much coverage.
In the digital age, what would the equivalent be? Megabytes massacred?
Whatever that is, it applies to Daily Deals sites (ala Groupon and clones & variations). From a retailer’s perspective, I am sceptical about the value. Butthat may be about to change.
A new site (xferral) was launched recently:. Unlike the others, this one is free for merchants. It seems to act like an aggregator of other deal sites as well, but since I am not a merchant I cannot test it. (From the list of sites they aggregate, this is an extremely competitive space – many I have never heard of.)
I am not sure what their business model is, presumably they will sell data to advertisers and/or retailers. When you visit the site, the browser (I use Firefox) prompts me to ‘share my location’ so it is collecting data. The downside is that it is US only (at this stage).
The problem I have with Daily Deals sites is that retailers use it in the wrong way, and they use if for the wrong product.
It is enticing to tap into a new, low-cost (in some cases) marketing opportunity but it does not always work out as planned.
To use these sites effectively, you have to understand the notion of KVI’s (Known Value Items). You can read more about it here.
Consumers know the value of certain items and they don’t know the value of others. If you want to run a loss-leader program, which these Daily Deals promotions are, then you have to pick a KVI.
Customers have to know that it is special when they see it.
Of course, you must then be ready to deal with it when it works. There is no point in doing the deal and this (low margin/ loss leader) is the ONLY transaction you have with that customer.
The purpose of a promotion like this is that you:
Deep discounts are also used to clear stock (your buying errors) but you should think carefully about making your ‘duds’ the first touch point hundreds of new customers will experience.
Think twice. Do once.
PS This LINK takes you to a site with many FAQs that explains in greater detail how many of these sites work.
I am a great fan of Dan Ariely. This is a good talk on a very relevant topic. Enjoy.
Pradeep’s book (The Buying Brain, 2010) is a must read. This post is the final extract on some of his findings – and it focuses on the applications of neuroscience in the retail aisle.
Think about that – and what it means
I will limit commentary, and just repeat some observations. (A typical male brain approach
)
As you read through this, you will likely think that you have seen examples of all of these somewhere. Some retailers have lucked into those solutions and others arrived by experimentation.
Others will have to ask someone who knows.
Last week we had a short overview of the Boomer and Neuromarketing. This week we look at female brain and what it means to marketers.
We mentioned earlier that the human brain has not changed much in the last 100, 000 years. Coupled to the fact that the worst outcome for the ancient human female was ostracism from the group (it jeopardises survival) – and this still applies today; the context is just different.
Here is a small case study presented by Pradeep in his book (The Buying Brain, 2010) for the re-design of a website that sold baby care products and other applications.
- Position visuals on the left and semantics on the right
- Feature moms using the product
- Create forum where they can gather and share tips
- Show mom-and-baby interactions
Next week – the final installment.
Last week we had a short introduction to neuroscience. This week we look at Boomers and what Neuromarketing means in that segment. The reality is that as little as 100 years ago, people did NOT age, they died. We are still learning about the aging process – and expect to have many myths busted in the next decade.
The Boomers (46-64 currently) is such a large segment that they have redefined society, business and certainly marketing in every generation as this demographic bulge moved through. They are also the richest generation – and money speaks loudly.
There is much to learn about how this group thinks and remembers – and we ignore it our peril.